OFFENSIVE SECURITY · PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Answer the question: are we already breached?
The question that keeps leadership up at night, answered from evidence rather than from the absence of alerts: log and endpoint telemetry collected, hunted against MITRE ATT&CK techniques, indicators and anomalies triaged, and correlated with infostealer and dark-web exposure — surfacing the dwell-time threats routine monitoring missed.
ENGAGEMENT AT A GLANCE
ScopeCorporate IT and OT/ICS
BasisThreat hunting against MITRE ATT&CK
OutputFindings with confidence ratings
YOU RECEIVE
Log and endpoint telemetry collection
Threat hunting across ATT&CK techniques
Indicator and anomaly triage
Infostealer and dark-web exposure correlation
Findings report with confidence ratings
WHAT'S COVERED
Scope of the engagement
01
Telemetry collection
Logs and endpoint data gathered from what you already run, with collection tooling deployed where the telemetry is missing.
02
Threat hunting
Hunting against MITRE ATT&CK techniques — the ones your detections were never written for as much as the ones they were.
03
Indicator & anomaly triage
Known indicators and unexplained behaviour worked through until each is either explained or confirmed.
04
Exposure correlation
Infostealer and dark-web exposure checked against what the hunt finds, so credentials already circulating are not missed.
05
Dwell-time analysis
Where something is found: how long it has been there, what it reached and whether it is still active — the questions incident response then picks up.
06
Findings & confidence
Each finding stated with its evidence and a confidence rating, so leadership knows how sure the answer is rather than only what it is.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Before you ask
We have a SIEM and nothing has alerted. Why do this?
Because the assessment is independent of existing alerts by design. It hunts for the techniques your detections were never written for, and for what has been sitting quietly under the threshold.
What happens if you find something?
The findings hand straight to incident response — containment, eradication and recovery — with the evidence already collected under proper handling. The two engagements are run by the same team.
What is the methodology based on?
Threat hunting grounded in real ransomware and web-shell DFIR case work, mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, plus correlation with infostealer and dark-web exposure so credentials already circulating are checked against what the hunt finds.
THE DELIVERABLE
What lands on your desk at the end
Before you sign, ask us exactly what the report contains — it is the fastest way to judge whether the work is worth buying.
REPORT CONTENTS
Executive answer to "are we compromised?", with confidence
Telemetry coverage — what was collected and what could not be
Findings per ATT&CK technique with evidence and confidence rating
Indicators of compromise in a form your tooling can consume
Recommended next steps — response, hardening or detection gaps
WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU
Access to logs, SIEM and endpoint telemetry
Deployment rights for collection tooling where telemetry is missing
Your domain names and brands, for exposure correlation
A named contact authorised to trigger response if something is found
FRAMEWORKS THIS EVIDENCES
MITRE ATT&CKNIST SP 800-61ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A
Findings are mapped to control references so the report can be handed to an auditor without translation.
Ready to secure your business?
Book a consultation with our engineers. Bring your architecture and your constraints — we'll tell you what we would do first, and why.
WHAT A CONSULTATION LOOKS LIKE
01
A conversation with an engineer
Not a sales call. Bring your architecture and your constraints.
02
A written gap summary
Prioritised, with what we would do first and why.
03
No obligation, no follow-up sequence
If it is not a fit we will say so on the call.
Not ready to talk? See the company facts — entity details, offices and our NTRA certification.
One inbox, answered by an engineer — not a routing queue.