OFFENSIVE SECURITY · PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Prove what an attacker could actually do
Evidence rather than theory: scoping and rules of engagement, reconnaissance, exploitation and privilege escalation, impact validation, a full report with an executive summary, and a retest once the fixes have landed. Delivered by OSCP-, eCPPT-, eMAPT-, eWAPTX- and CRTP-certified testers, with a safe methodology for OT.
ENGAGEMENT AT A GLANCE
TargetsWeb, mobile, API, network, OT/ICS
ApproachWhite-box and black-box
OutputRanked findings + retest
YOU RECEIVE
Scoping and signed rules of engagement
Exploitation with impact validated, not assumed
Findings ranked by exploitability and business impact
Full report with an executive summary
Retest after remediation
WHAT'S COVERED
Scope of the engagement
01
Web & API
Applications and the APIs behind them, tested white-box or black-box for the flaws that lead to data, accounts and the systems beyond.
02
Mobile
iOS and Android applications and the services they talk to — storage, transport, authentication and the API surface the app exposes.
03
Network & infrastructure
External and internal network testing: exposed services, misconfiguration, credential weaknesses and the routes from a foothold to what matters.
04
Source code
White-box review of the code itself where you can share it, finding the flaws a black-box test would need luck to reach.
05
OT/ICS
Industrial targets tested under a safe methodology agreed with the plant engineers — proving exposure without touching the process.
06
Impact validation & retest
What an attacker could actually do with each finding, demonstrated rather than rated — then a retest once the fixes have landed.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Before you ask
How is this different from a vulnerability assessment?
A vulnerability assessment finds and validates known weaknesses across the estate, broadly and often. A penetration test exploits them to prove what an attacker could actually achieve, and gives leadership evidence-based confidence or a clear, ranked fix list.
How is this different from red teaming?
A penetration test enumerates and exploits weaknesses in a defined target. A red team pursues an objective across the whole organisation and measures whether anyone noticed. If the question is "what is wrong with this system", it is a penetration test.
Who does the testing?
Certified testers — OSCP, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWAPTX and CRTP — working under signed rules of engagement, with a named contact on each side who can halt the test at any point.
THE DELIVERABLE
What lands on your desk at the end
Before you sign, ask us exactly what the report contains — it is the fastest way to judge whether the work is worth buying.
REPORT CONTENTS
Executive summary written for a board
Findings with proof of exploitation and validated impact
Ranked fix list by exploitability and business impact
Technical detail sufficient to reproduce and to fix
Retest results against every original finding
WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU
Signed rules of engagement and written authorisation
The targets, environments and test accounts in scope
Source code or documentation for white-box work
A contact who can halt the test
FRAMEWORKS THIS EVIDENCES
OWASP (web, API and mobile)MITRE ATT&CKISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex APCI DSS v4.0.1 (Requirement 11.4)
Findings are mapped to control references so the report can be handed to an auditor without translation.
Ready to secure your business?
Book a consultation with our engineers. Bring your architecture and your constraints — we'll tell you what we would do first, and why.
WHAT A CONSULTATION LOOKS LIKE
01
A conversation with an engineer
Not a sales call. Bring your architecture and your constraints.
02
A written gap summary
Prioritised, with what we would do first and why.
03
No obligation, no follow-up sequence
If it is not a fit we will say so on the call.
Not ready to talk? See the company facts — entity details, offices and our NTRA certification.
One inbox, answered by an engineer — not a routing queue.